War Criminal Tuke In Custody for His Heinous Crimes Against the People of Somaliland

November 20, 2022

The long saga of a war criminal Col. Yusuf Abdi Ali Tuke who lived comfortably and with impunity in one of the freest countries on earth with the very people he has brutalized in unimaginable ways including setting victims on fire may be finally over. Mr. Tuke was taken into custody by the United States Homeland Security Investigations in Springfield Virginia for war crimes he committed in Gabiley Somaliland.

Colonel Tuke as he is widely known first surfaced in Canada where he immigrated after the collapse of the dictatorial regime of Siad Barre where he served as the Commander of the Fifth Brigade in Gabiley in the present-day Republic of Somaliland where the people of Somaliland and particularly the Isaaq tribe were targeted for genocide by Barre’s regime.

In Canada, Mr. Tuke was exposed by his victims who reported him to the authorities and the media, where Mr. Tuke even faced reporters to deny the accusations leveled against him and taunt his victims to “go to court”. He was deported by Canadian authorities to the United States in October 1992.

Mr. Tuke has been arrested in the United States before, in 1998 for an immigration-related matter and although US government agencies were aware of the accusations against him, he remained in the United States.

In late 2019, a jury in the Eastern District of Virginia found Colonel Tuke liable in a civil suit brought by Mr. Farhan Warfaa who accused the former member of the Somali Army of shooting him at point-blank range and leaving him for dead after months of torture. Mr. Warfaa, who was represented by the Center for Justice and Accountability, was awarded 500,000 US in damages. It is unclear if Mr. Tuke has made restitution to Mr. Warfaa.

Mr. Tuke’s current legal predicament is the most serious, as this time he faces the genocidal acts he committed in Gabiley in 1987 – 1988 where his monstrous acts have taken place.

“While Yusuf Abdi Ali’s apprehension cannot undo the pain that he allegedly inflicted upon the victims of his purported human rights abuses, it is my sincere hope that by seeing him answer for his apparent role in these heinous crimes, they will be given some form of peace,” said Derek W. Gordon, acting special agent in charge of HSI Washington, D.C. in a press release.

Mr. Okeke-Von Batten, who claimed to have changed his mind about efforts to lobby for Somaliland after learning about Somaliland’s “human rights violations” and instead went to lobby for the Somali government and the Somali United Alliance charity organization, denied any knowledge of Mr. Tuke and his crimes against humanity. Mr. Tuke works for the Somali Embassy in Washington, DC.

Although media outlets are reporting Colonel Tuke as high-ranking in the murderous Somali National Army, in the vast and complex genocidal war machine deployed by dictator Siad Barre against the people of Somaliland, there are even bigger violators such as General Mohammed Said Hersi Morgan widely known as the Butcher of Hargeisa.

General Morgan, who is the late dictator’s son-in-law and his last Minister of Defense, currently serves as an advisor to President Saeed Abdullahi Deni of Puntland province of Somalia and was the commander 26th Sector of the Somali Army based in present-day Somaliland.

Because of the genocidal acts committed by Dictator Barre and his henchmen such as Tuke and Morgan against the people of Somaliland, an armed struggle by the Somali National Movement has begun and despite the unfavorable odds faced by ordinary men and women that stood up against tyranny, SNM has brought the end of Barre’s rain of terror and ushered in the rebirth of the Republic of Somaliland.

So far efforts to bring war criminals like Tuke to justice were entirely done by private individuals and while there are others who declined to speak about their efforts with various authorities around the globe to bring other war criminals accountable for their actions, the Somaliland government has not actively pursued war criminals like General Morgan who lives within 100 kilometers from its borders.

Somaliland Opposition Parties Declare Government’s Executive Branch as Illegal

Staff

November 14, 2022

In a press conference, the leaders of Somaliland’s two opposition parties Waddani and UCID stated that they no longer recognize the government led by President Muse Bihi as legitimate and added that henceforth shall be referred to as the President whose term has expired and the Chairman of Kulmiye Party.

Mr. Abdirahman Mohamed Abdullahi (Cirro) and Mr. Faisal Ali Warabe have previously stated that they will no longer recognize President Bihi after November 13th, 2022, when the House of Elders has given the President a two-year term extension.

“We call all of you to strengthen your peace, and unity and protect your stability without allowing anything illegal and dictatorship,” the statement from the opposition parties said.

Efforts to bring the opposition leaders and the President have not succeeded and are still ongoing. Unconfirmed reports indicate that the two sides may meet in the coming days.

The Minister of Interior Mr. Mohamed Kahin Ahmed and the Commander of Police Forces, Brigadier-General Mohammed Adan Saqadhi (Dabagale) responded to the opposition’s statement. Brigadier-General Dabagale as he is widely known have stressed the importance of peace and security where Minister Kahin spoke about Mr. Cirro’s 12 year-term as the ormer Speaker of the Parliament where his term was repeatedly extended.

Election disputes and term extensions for Presidents and legislators have been a constant factor in most elections held since the re-independence of the Republic. The current dispute centers on which of the two elections will be held first: Presidential or Political Parties and Associations. The opposition parties claim the presidential elections should be held first on November 13th, and have accused the President of deliberately delaying it by disbanding the previous National Election Commission.

President Bihi whose term was extended by two years by the House of Elders has stated that his government has prepared all the funding necessary to complete the voter registration, that the political parties and the Presidential elections will be held within the nine-month period per the recommendation of the National Election Commission. It is unclear which of the two elections will be held first and exactly when.

Political Parties and Associations have completed the first qualifying round which produced a total of nine political party aspirants who, together with the current three political parties of Waddani, UCID, and the ruling party of Kulmiye, will compete for one of three coveted spots to become national party for a period of ten years.

13 November: A Time Bomb Set to Explode in Somaliland

Staff

November 10, 2022

For the last few years, all clocks in Somaliland have been fixed to 13 November 2022 – the day presidential elections were due to take place in Somaliland. The date was envisioned to be a decisive moment that will put Somaliland past political crisis that have been unfolding over the last couple of years. One thing is now certain: no election will take place on 13^th November. Although Somaliland is one of the most vibrant democracies in Africa, its elections are almost always late. While previous election delays always had a deal reached by the stakeholders ahead of election day, this time the date approaches with no such agreements yet reached by the president, political parties and other key stakeholders. This puts Somaliland at a considerably dangerous path to un-explored episodes of lawlessness and potential violence. What is at stake here is Somaliland’s sustained history of peace and civic governance that can potentially be put to a break should the current disagreements go beyond November 13. The president (and his ruling party) and political parties are the main actors, all maintaining extreme ends of a continuum of the election process.

The president’s position is quite clear. He cannot compete with the existing political parties, at least in their current form and shape. The May 2021 joint elections were a wake-up call for the president. Opposition parties hugely defeated the ruling party: Waddani alone elected more MPs than the ruling Kulmiye, speakership of the House of Representatives is fully dominated by the opposition, and the opposition parties won the mayorships of 5 of the 6 provincial capitals. Although the president was granted a two-year term extension by the Guurti (the House of Elders), he is putting all his efforts to ensure necessary preparations and resources are in place to conduct tow subsequent elections in 2023.

While all eyes are set to 13 November, another important date is December 26 – the date that current political parties’ licenses expire. The ruling party’s plan is to hold tight until 26 December (for the political parties to lose their licenses) and then proceed with party elections. So far, the ruling party made all efforts to fast track the registration and qualification of political associations that will participate in the upcoming political party elections. Nine new political associations have made it to the final list and will compete with the current political parties in 2023. In the same year, presidential elections will follow suit, participated by the three political parties that emerge victorious from the preceding party elections. To the ruling party, the results of party elections will be in their favor, whatever the outcome.

The opposition parties also maintain the other extreme. Basically, November comes before December – the president first loses legitimacy (on November 13) before their licenses expire on December 26. The opposition parties’ stance is that the president is only legitimate until 13 November and no other elections, other than presidential elections, should take place in Somaliland. The political parties have waited for five long years and have been mobilizing and expanding their support bases to compete with the ruling party. They cannot lose five-years’ worth of efforts and start afresh. For the past couple of months, the opposition parties have been organizing rallies and meetings with their supporters in the different regions to be ready for action. Come November 13^th, the opposition parties will proclaim the president and his government illegitimate and that can have catastrophic consequences. For the first time in Somaliland’s history, the head of the state may be declared ‘illegitimate’ and parallel governments may be instituted. There have been calls from traditional authorities in support of both sides. At a grand clan conference in Burco in October, one of the largest clans in Somaliland concluded that ‘the term extension by the Guurti was unconstitutional and that no political party elections will be conducted in their constituencies’.

The current political impasse tests Somaliland’s democratic institutions and local conflict resolution capacities. Nearly all local capacities that historically kept Somaliland together have been exhausted and are losing relevance, including the Guurti, traditional authorities and business elites. The Guurti – best described as the House of Heirs as the current incumbents are mostly the children or relatives of the initially clan-selected elders – is no longer able to mediate political disagreements. The Guurti’s response to the looming political crisis was a five-year term extension for themselves and a two-year term extension for the president and vice president. Traditional elders and religious leaders have also tried to broker a deal between the president and opposition parties, but their efforts failed. And finally, some of the biggest business tycoons came together and suggested possibly the most sensible proposition that can meet the interests of both the ruling party and opposition parties. Business elites suggested a joint presidential and party elections, with the current political parties competing for the presidency while the three political parties and emerging political associations participate in the political party elections. Unfortunately, this suggestion was also not well received by the key political stakeholders.

As Somaliland approaches the much-awaited 13 November, one can only contemplate on the possibilities that lay ahead. In my view, three potential scenarios could unfold.

1. No Deal: the date arrives with no political consensus reached. This is the most likely scenario. The possible consequences are detrimental: president and his government declared illegitimate, mass demonstrations, bloody clashes between police and demonstrators, all-time low revenue collection capacity and possible inter-communal clashes! And after days/weeks of these episodes, the key stakeholders come to their senses and local conflict resolutions are put to work to broker a way out of the situation. After all, proactive problem-solving is not one of the best qualities of president Bihi, the most important actor in the current crisis. It is still a possibility that restoring peace and order may be a long shot!

2. Last-minute Deal Brokered by the International Community: in the past, Somaliland’s international partners have stepped up to mediate political actors in Somaliland. Any such mediation efforts may be subject to president Bihi’s acceptance. President Bihi is not a big fan of democracy and openly criticized the role of international partners in Somaliland’s governance and development endeavors. The international partners, on the other hand, may only intervene when they are certain that their efforts will yield a political consensus.

3. Hold Tight Until December 26: this defining date could also legally see all political parties losing their license and, hence, political associations and current political parties could equally participate in any discussions on the election roadmap. This highly unlikely scenario could rule in favor of the president who can confidently deliver two subsequent elections in 2023. This will come with huge costs and, by then, elections may no longer be a priority for Somaliland. This is too high a risk to entertain.

A ‘magic bullet’ is still possible to save Somaliland from this uncertainty! As always, stakeholders can all compromise and forge a quick-fix political settlement in the remaining days. All formal and informal conflict resolution institutions should be activated to broker a deal. The international partners should not shy away from trying their level best to mediate even if the results of their efforts may not be too visible. There are so many viable options that can meet the interests of all, including the proposition by the business elites.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Mubarak Geeddi is a development worker based in Hargeisa. Mubarak has master’s in International Development: Politics, Governance and Development Policies. He is available on Twitter (@MubGeedi).

Disclaimer: The viewpoints expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect the opinions, viewpoints of Somaliland Chronicle, and its staff.

Notice: This article by Somaliland Chronicle is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Under this license, all reprints and non-commercial distribution of this work is permitted.

Manufacturing Conglomerate IFFCO to Open a Massive Food Processing Plant in Berbera Economic Zone

Staff

November 8, 2022

According to a press release by DP World, the international ports operator and current manager of Berbera Port has signed a 20-year lease with IFFCO to develop a food-grade oil packing plant in the Berbera Economic Zone (BEZ) in Somaliland. The 300,000 sq. ft food-grade oil processing plant in Berbera Economic Zone is scheduled to be completed by the first half of 2023 with future expansion plans to double its size.

Berbera Economic Zone is in the making. "Berbera Economic Zone (BEZ)’s proximity to the Port of Berbera positions it as the new integrated maritime, logistics, and industrial hub in the horn of Africa, creating a new value-added gateway for the region" @DP_World #Somaliland pic.twitter.com/IG8VQSomjX
— Abdirashid Ibrahim Abdirahman (@cabdirashed) August 10, 2022

IFFCO, short for Indian Farmers Fertiliser Cooperative Limited, was established in 1975, has a presence in 37 countries, and has products that range from food and packaged goods to chemicals.

At the signing of the agreement between DP World and IFFCO, Suhail Albanna, CEO & Managing Director of DP World, Middle East & Africa said “The decision by IFFCO to set up a plant is a major vote of confidence in the zone and a testament to our offerings. In fact, with the port, the economic zone and the one-stop-shop all under DP World, it will be like a home away from home for Dubai-based customers such as IFFCO.”

The arrival of IFFCO in Somaliland is a major vote of confidence that follows DP World’s massive investment and development of Berbera Port and the Economic Zone.

Although Somaliland is a small market relative to landlocked Ethiopia, it gives manufacturers such as IFFCO a competitive edge that brings their products to a largely underdeveloped and food-insecure region where the majority of packaged foods and other consumer products are imported from overseas.

“IFFCO continues to invest in the future of food and supply chains globally. The partnership with DP World demonstrates our commitment to the UAE’s national food security strategy and facilitating global food trade. It also further enhances access to African consumer bases quickly and more efficiently.” said Mr. Shiraz Allana, director and supervisory board member of IFFCO.

Taiwan injects momentum into the global transition to net-zero emissions

Staff

November 6, 2022

Chang Tzi-chin
Minister of the Environmental Protection Administration
Republic of China (Taiwan)

The world has embarked on the transition to net-zero emissions. The innovative approaches to international cooperation highlighted in the Paris Agreement—which calls for wide cooperation by all countries to meet global reduction targets—are gradually taking shape. Taiwan is willing and able to cooperate with international partners to jointly achieve net-zero transition, mobilize global climate action, and ensure a sustainable environment for future generations.

As the world’s 21st-largest economy, Taiwan has an important influence on economic prosperity and stability in the Indo-Pacific region. In particular, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry occupies a pivotal position in international supply chains. The industry actively cuts the use of energy resources in its production processes by developing new technologies and new models. Through ever-evolving semiconductor innovations, it has developed numerous smart applications of electronic devices and promoted global energy conservation. Taiwan is carrying out substantial climate actions and vigorously advancing energy transition. As of May 2022, cumulative installed renewable energy capacity had reached 12.3 GW, a significant 60 percent increase from 2016. From 2005 to 2020, Taiwan’s GDP grew by 79 percent. Over the same period, greenhouse gas emission intensity fell by 45 percent, demonstrating that economic growth has been decoupled from greenhouse gas emissions.

On Earth Day of April 22, 2021, President Tsai Ing-wen announced Taiwan’s goal of net-zero emissions by 2050. In March 2022, the Executive Yuan published Taiwan’s Pathway to Net-Zero Emissions in 2050. The roadmap outlines four major transition strategies in energy, industry, lifestyles, and society. Resting on the twin governance foundations of technology research and development (R&D) and climate legislation, the strategies are supplemented by 12 key substrategies. These are wind and solar power; hydrogen; innovative energy; power systems and energy storage; energy conservation and efficiency; carbon capture, utilization, and storage; carbon-free and electric vehicles; resource recycling and zero waste; natural carbon sinks; green lifestyles; green finance; and just transition. By integrating intragovernmental resources, Taiwan will develop a step-by-step action plan to reach its targets.

In building the foundations of technology R&D needed to achieve net-zero transition, Taiwan will focus on five areas: sustainable energy, low carbon, circularity, carbon negativity, and social science. The Greenhouse Gas Reduction and Management Act is being amended and will be renamed the Climate Change Response Act. The amendments will make net-zero emissions by 2050 a long-term national reduction target, improve the effectiveness of climate governance, add a chapter on climate change adaptation, strengthen information disclosure and public participation, and introduce a carbon pricing mechanism. The act will provide economic incentives for emissions reduction, guide low-carbon and green growth, and contribute to completing the foundations of national climate legislation and governance. Taiwan’s long-term vision for 2050 is to make the transition to net-zero emissions the new driving force of national development. By creating competitive, circular, sustainable, resilient, and secure transition strategies and governance foundations, Taiwan will stimulate economic growth, encourage private investment, create green jobs, promote energy independence, and improve social well-being.

Due to political factors, Taiwan is excluded from international organizations and cannot participate substantively in discussions on global climate issues. It is difficult for Taiwan to stay abreast of current developments and properly implement related tasks. This will create gaps in global climate governance. Taiwan has limited independent sources of energy and an economic system that is oriented to foreign trade. If it cannot seamlessly link with the international cooperation mechanisms under the Paris Agreement, this will not only affect the process of Taiwanese industries going green but will also undermine the stability of international supply chains. Presented with the threat of carbon border adjustment measures, Taiwan’s overall competitiveness could be seriously hit if it is unable to fairly participate in international emission reduction mechanisms. This will also weaken the effectiveness of international cooperation and undermine the global economy.

Making the transition to net-zero emissions is an inescapable collective responsibility of this generation. It will only be possible to achieve the target if the international community works together. In the spirit of pragmatism and professionalism, Taiwan is willing to make concrete contributions to tackling global climate change. The COVID-19 pandemic has shown that whatever the situation, Taiwan has enormous potential to contribute to the world in extremely helpful ways. Taiwan should be given equal opportunity to join international cooperation mechanisms in response to climate change. We hope the international community will support Taiwan’s immediate, fair, and meaningful inclusion.

Prominent Somalilanders Increasingly Under Attack On Social Media, We Must Ask Ourselves Why and By Whom?

Staff

November 5, 2022

Over the past few days Somaliland social media has been awash with highly organised and choreographed posts and tweets, attacking prominent Somalilanders. The prominent Somalilanders under sudden attack include Marwo Fadumo Siciid (a Senior Advisor to the Parliament of Somaliland) and Suldaan ‘Iskama Jiidhe’ (a prominent Somaliland social media satirist and comedian).

Why is this important?

The individuals under attack all have one thing in common: these individuals have a record of standing up for Somalilanders. Of coming to the aid of Somalilands social consciousness. These are individuals who, overall, have tended to speak up for Somaliland’s sovereignty, independence, and national identity.

The posts attacking Somalilanders were clearly not organic in nature, but one could sense a hidden hand behind the scenes, directing these posts. The tweets and Facebook posts attacking Suldaan Iskama Jiidhe and Fadumo Siciid were deeply personalised in nature, clearly co-ordinated, synchronised in language and content, and overall highly choreographed.

Wars take many forms. Take a look at the @M_Farmaajo gov in #Somalia & it’s social media methodology. The propaganda war is primarily directed against the Republic of #Somaliland. “Dagaal wuu noocyo badan yahay, iskula soo boodkaa ugu liita”. pic.twitter.com/2LsgRIYU1t
— Mahmoud Adam Jama “Galaal” (@majgalaal) February 10, 2019

These aforementioned posts attack Suldaan Iskama Jiidhe and Faadumo Siciid were also disproportionate, graphic and often vulgar in nature. They called for Suldaan Iskama Jiidhe in particular to be locked up, to be deprived of his liberty. To be chastised. To be criticised. Or worse still, to come to physical harm.

Specific Facebook users and YouTubers who parade themselves as so-called ‘journalists’ went as far as tracking down and going to the house of Suldaan Iskama Jiidhe’s elderly grandmother. Thereafter forcing her to record an apology video.

Why?

Why was Suldaan Iskama Jiidhe attacked in such an aggressive fashion? Why was he pursued in such a vociferous way? What is it he supposedly did? Suldaan Iskama Jiidhe voiced an opinion, in his TikTok post, that may have been offensive or hurtful to Somalians.

Why was Fadumo Saeed pursued in such an aggressive fashion? What is it she supposedly did? She made a speech voicing an opinion that may have been unpopular with Somalians: that a citizen of Somaliland is called a Somalilander, not simply a ‘Somali’. This should not he controversial at all. It is not Fadumo Siciid’s role to appease, please or ingratiate herself with Somalians. She was doing her job, which is representing Somalilanders. She was also making and important point: that there is a distinction between Somalilanders (citizens of Somaliland) and Somalians (citizens of Somalia). She said something that needs to be said more often, more loudly and more vociferously by all Somalilanders.

The volume and intensity of abuse they received does not appear to match the original actions that supposedly triggered this response. The TikTok post by Suldaan Iskama Jiidhe and speech by Fadumo Siciid were, in hindsight, clearly a pretext to attack these prominent Somalilanders.

Why the attacks are baseless

You may disagree with what Suldaan said. You may have found it offensive. You may disagree. What law precisely in Somaliland makes it illegal to say something that is offensive to Somalia or Somalians? What about his freedom of speech? Who placed on Somalilanders an obligation or pre-occupation to appease, or ingratiate themselves with Somalia or Somalians?

Somalilanders have no need to virtue signal to Somalia or to Somalians. Somalia is the country that harbours, rewards, promotes and holds in the highest of esteem the likes of General Morgan (The Butcher of Hargeisa), Colonel Tuke and many other mass murderers, war criminals and genocidaires.

Somalia is the country that does not afford peace even to ships on the High seas of the Indian Ocean, hundreds of kilometers from Somalia’s coast. Somalia is the country that uses food as a weapon of war, resulting in no less than 500,000 deaths due to man-made famines in 1992 and in 2011. Somalia is the country that has the majority of its territory controlled by the terrorist group Al Shabab, but that also invited 25,000 foreign troops to protect its government which was last elected in 1969.

What moral authority do Somalian politicians and political elite have to lecture Somalilanders about morality, ethics or values? We have no need to virtue signalling to Somalia. Our virtues are perfectly in tact.

Baroortu Orgiga Ka Weyn – the cry is bigger than the injury

So what’s really going on here and what’s this all about?… Is this just about a simple TikTok post from Suldaan Iskama Jiidhe? Is this apparent furore about a simple public message Fadumo Siciid? Of course it is not. There is something else – something far deeper, sinister and more organised – going on here.

Any Somalilander or external observer who has been watching Somali social media, will tell you there has been a long-ongoing campaign of demonising prominent Somalilanders, especially those with a large following. This often takes the form of persistent targeted harassment in the form of personal attacks. The waves of attacks are used go demonise, vilify and deligitimise prominent Somalilanders with a large social following.

The people behind these attacks are often unionist-extremist Somalians. Theirs is a campaign designed to demonise, demoralise and de-humanise Somalilanders. They clasp and grasp at any opportunity to attack prominent Somalilanders. In fact, they never pass up an opportunity to vilify Somalilanders. They always use a pretext, but are attacking Somalilanders for their deeply held and highly cherished lofty values of Somalilander-ness.

Showing solidarity with your fellow Somalilander

Upon reading all the vile tweets and Facebook posts targeted at these two Somalilanders, I recalled all the Somalilanders who had suffered similar targeted harassment and abuse. I remembered how Mohammed BK, The Siciid Show, Mo Farah and Edna Adan were terrorised by Somalian trolls.

I recalled that we threw Mohammed BK to the proverbial wolves. He did not receive the support from us when he needed it. That we threw The Siciid Show to the wolves. He did not receive the support from us when he needed it. That we threw Mo Farah to the wolves. He did not receive the support from us when he needed it. That we threw Gaboose to the wolves. He did not receive the support from us when he needed it. That we threw Minister Koore to the wolves. He did not receive the support from us when he needed it.

Should we now throw Suldaan Iskama Jiidhe and Faadumo Siciid to the wolves also? Of course not.

I was not politically aware, conscious or attuned enough to stand up and support them then. But now, as Dr Gaboose, Minister Koore, Suldaan Iskama Jiidhe and Faduma Siciid are being hounded. I felt an urge – a need, a want, an instinct – to show solidarity with my fellow Somalilander. I can, will and must stand up for them.

This is a matter of principle. If you don’t stand up for your fellow Somalilanders when they are being harassed, intimidated, cyber-bullied and attacked, who will be there to stand up for you in your hour of need.

A selection of tweets supporting Marwo Fadumo Siciid:

This is the first time in my life to put women in any of social media profiles,but now I am doing for this great women hero Dr Fatima Saeed is under attack by Somali Expensionist so, I am standing with her as solidarity by putting my Twitter profile. pic.twitter.com/ju9es0w16w
— Ahmed🇪🇹 (@Hawd24news) November 4, 2022

Waxaanu garab taagahay habeen iyo maalinba waanu ku faanaynaa siddaad u muujisay Wadaniyada dhabta waxaynu nahay Somalilanders ee mani Somalian.
Mahadsanid Walaal.
— Xuseen Dantihaye (@DantihayeXuseen) November 4, 2022

Fadumo Saeed taught us this today:

Some things you cannot sit on the fence. You cannot be neutral. You cannot have a fake balance.

Justice > injustice
Dignity > indignity
Nationality > ethnicity

There can be no bothsideism.
No false equivalence.
No false balance. https://t.co/052UAZeued
— Dr Adali Warsame (@AdaliteKingdom) November 4, 2022

I might not have been their for BK, Mo Farah & other patriotic landers. But now I say Not On My Watch. She has me in her corner. I will NOT throw her to the wolves. #WeWillNotThrowYouToTheWolves
— Iskama Jiidhe (@genuineLander) November 4, 2022

We need to be her shield. Stand firmly in support of her statement & say“We Are Somaliland’ers” most importantly, we need not to throw her to the wolves. Like we did BK & other landers who stood up for us. Protect them from somalia’n organized attacks
— Iskama Jiidhe (@genuineLander) November 4, 2022

About the Author

Adali Warsame is a political commentator and public policy professional, who is a long time observer of Somaliland politics. He writing focuses on standing up for the dignity of Somaliland’s citizens, who appear to be forgotten in the melee that is everyday Somaliland and Horn of Africa politics.

Adali is an unapologetic Somalilander. He is passionate about achieving justice for the forgotten Isaaq Genocide victims, stopping the doomed Somaliland-Somalia talks and international recognition of the Republic of Somaliland.

Disclaimer: The viewpoints expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect the opinions, viewpoints of Somaliland Chronicle, and its staff.

Dengue Fever Claims more Lives in Somaliland as Government Downplays the Dangers of the Tropical Disease

Staff

October 30, 2022

A deadly Dengue Fever is being reported in Somaliland for the past several weeks. Although the government acknowledges the disease and that it is confirmed in all regions of the country, it has repeatedly downplayed its lethality and has not issued official statistics on infection and mortality rate but has issued a National Guidelines On Management of Dengue Fever and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever.

The National Guidelines document, which the Ministry of Health Development issued in English, was later proven that it was plagiarized from Sri Lanka‘s Ministry of Health in its entirety and prescribes remedies and medications that are unavailable in Somaliland to combat the Dengue disease.

About a month ago, at the unveiling of the National Guidelines On Management of Dengue Fever and Dengue Hemorrhagic Fever, the Director General of the Ministry of Health Development, Mr. Mohamed Abdi Hergeye spoke to the media about the fever and downplayed the lethality rate as low and told the public to avoid mosquito bites and to avoid mosquito breeding areas where water pools during the rainy season and that the government will start spraying the mosquitos. So far, limited areas such as Hargeisa Group Hospital have been sprayed.

Deputy Minister of Health, Mr. Liban Yusuf Osman, also spoke at the event reiterated that the Dengue Fever is not lethal and the Ministry has so far not proven any deaths associated with the disease. The Deputy Minister of Health has no medical background.

Information on the World Health Organization about Dengue fever states that the disease’s fatality rate is less than one percent with proper medical treatment and early detection. Other health sources warn of a sharp rise in mortality of patients if left untreated.

Sources in the healthcare sector who did not want to be named for fear of retaliation confirm treating many patients with the disease and that the mortality rate is much higher than what it should be because of the state of healthcare and patients not seeking medical attention in a timely manner due to lack of information and public awareness about the disease.

Lack of proper medical facilities and the government’s denial of the disease as a major public health could compound its effect. Public health infrastructure in Somaliland is one of the least developed in the world due to many factor including rampant corruption, and while many private medical facilities exist, most do not meet minimal global health standards and operate with minimum official supervision.

Officials from the Ministry of Health did not respond to questions on their plan and what the Ministry of doing to ensure public safety.

How Somalia is trying to Stifle Somaliland – US ties with an Online Troll and a pseudo-Charitable Organization

Staff

October 29, 2022

In February, June, and August 2022, Mr. Okeke-Von Batten filed Lobby Disclosure Act and Foreign Agent Registration Act forms to lobby on behalf of the Federal Government of Somalia, the Somali Embassy in Washington DC, and the United Somali Alliance to prevent the US government’s engagement with Somaliland as a separate entity and the possibility of a military base in Berbera.

Mr. Okeke-Von Batten whose actual name is Dr. Karl-Marx Edward Ikemefuna William George Okeke–Von Batten but goes by Karl Von Batten has rather limited clients that do not match his outsized bravado on social media where he claims to influence Capitol Hill on matters on Somaliland and the United States. Mr. Okeke-Von Batten has repeatedly claimed that he has blocked multiple bills in the US Congress including the Somaliland Partnership Act.

Before establishing his lobbying firm, Mr. Okeke-Von Batten tried his hand at other ventures including the now-shuttered Health Informatics Corporation.

Mr. Okeke-Von Batten’s lobbying firm VONBATTEN-MONTAGUE-YORK L.C. was established on October 13, 2020, as an LLC and so far seems to have booked a very limited number of clients including his firm which filed Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) before the United States government announced that Ethiopia is kicked out of AGOA, Mr. Okeke immediately claimed that the act was his doing on social media although his filing was months after the decision was already made by the United States government.

Mr. Okeke-Von Batten initially filed a Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) registration for the United Somali Alliance of the USA on February 4. Four months later, he registered with the Department of Justice under the Foreign Agents Registration Act for the Embassy of the Federal Republic of Somalia on June 22 with a one-week contract and payment terms of $1. In addition, he filed an LDA registration for the Embassy of the Federal Republic of Somalia on the same day. LDA registrations require less disclosure than the Justice department’s FARA registrations, but anyone working at the direction of a foreign government is legally required to report their activities to the Department of Justice through established FARA procedures.

However, there are no FARA filings for the United Somali Alliance whose goals seem to align perfectly with that of the Somali Government which Mr. Okeke-Von Batten represents.

On paper, the United Somali Alliance is a run-of-the-mill tax-exempt organization based out of Minneapolis but is working with Mr. Okeke-Von Batten and the Somali Embassy in Washington DC in a coordinated effort to thwart potential bilateral ties between Somaliland and the United States.

All indications are that United Somali Alliance is operating at the direction of the Somali Embassy in Washington DC and the Somali government – as many of the below social media posts suggest – undertaking these activities without having registered under FARA may constitute a violation of federal law. And if Mr. Okeke-Von Batten is operating at the direction of the Somali government – either directly or through the United Somali Alliance as many of their shared social media posts also suggest – undertaking these activities without having reported his current relationship and their nature with the Somali government, a foreign entity, may also constitute a violation of federal law.

United Somalia Alliance, established on January 26, 2022, and registered as a 501c3 [EIN: 87-4659308] is a tax-exempt charitable organization with a combined reported income of $50,000 or less, and according to the IRS, an organization of this type is strictly prohibited from engaging in any political activity and especially any activity that influences legislation, and hiring Mr. Okeke-Von Batten to engage in lobbying activities on their behalf in the US Senate, possibly under the direct influence of the Embassy of Somalia and the Somalia government may be a direct violation of the basic principle of a tax-exempt 501c3 organization.

According to the Internal Service Revenue’s website “Nonprofit organizations that qualify for federal income tax exemption as public charities under Section 501(c)(3) of the Code are subject to heightened restrictions on lobbying and political activities. Carrying on propaganda, or otherwise attempting to influence legislation may not constitute a “substantial part” of the activities of an organization exempt under Section 501(c)(3); exceeding the “substantial part” limit places an organization at risk of losing its exempt status.”

From United Somalia Alliance’s social media accounts, it is clear that this organization works directly with the Somali government and is investing a significant amount of its energy in slandering Somaliland, and from their Facebook page, where most posts are in Somali, it is clear that United Somali Alliance is not only extremely political but is campaigning to destabilize Somaliland with toxic tribal rhetoric.

Before Mr. Okeke-Von Batten went to work for Somalia, he wrote an eight-page proposal to seek a lobbying gig from Somalia’s neighbor – The Republic of Somaliland.

VBMY-Report-on-Republic-of-Somaliland Download

On July 25th, 2021 Mr. Okeke-Von Batten prepared an 8th-page report outlining his plan to get Somaliland noticed in the hall of American power and stated in writing that “A stable democracy, Somaliland contrasts dramatically with Somalia, which perpetually teeters on the brink of state failure.”

In his pitch, Mr. Okeke-Von Batten claimed to use sophisticated and state-of-the-art sentiment analysis and data mining methods similar to what was used by President Obama in his 2012 election campaign to get members of Congress to change their perception of Somaliland.

In the Strategic PR and Lobbying Campaign section of the document, he wrote “It is also essential to build concrete support for the US to provide direct political, financial, and humanitarian assistance to Somaliland and to include Somaliland in preferred US trade agreements such as trading opportunities as authorized by the African Growth and Opportunity Act.” AGOA or the African Growth and Opportunity Act seems to be Mr. Okeke-Von Batten’s go-to for anyone he seeks to represent.

We have reached out to Mr. Okeke-Von Batten for this report and asked him about his document on how he can bring Somaliland the attention it deserves among other things and asked him “Regarding Somaliland, in your pitch document, you wrote “A stable democracy, Somaliland contrasts dramatically with Somalia, which perpetually teeters on the brink of state failure.” and now you call a secessionist region of Somalia, what changed? And could your current sentiment on Somaliland have anything to do with the fact that Somaliland did not accept your offer to represent it?” he responded as follows:

“When we were approached to represent Somaliland a few years ago, we, as with key members of Congress, were only aware of the positive image Somaliland had presented to the world. An image that was soon changed after we received in-depth briefings about Somaliland’s human rights violations and the effects an illegal Somaliland break away from Somalia would have on the stability of the Horn of Africa. Then we spoke to our friends at the African Union and decided to no longer consider representing Somaliland. All this and more were made known to our Somali clients before they hired us. They were fully informed of our past discussion with Somaliland representatives and our decision not to proceed with Somaliland.”

Officials from Somaliland’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Development dismiss that Mr. Okeke-Von Batten was approached by the government of Somaliland, one official who did not want to speak on the record stated “The Republic of Somaliland has all the resources it needs in the United States, a global player which sees its interests, particularly national security, align with ours, and we are very careful in choosing who we partner with in these sensitive matters. I can tell you with certainty that Somaliland has not approached this individual, and he can produce evidence to the contrary, but judging from what he puts out to the world and his weak moral fiber, he is definitely not the type of person we would associate with.”

Although Somaliland has its share of mishaps like all emerging democracies, it is interesting to note the contrast that Mr. Okeke-Von Batten in his report between Somaliland and Somalia by writing: “A stable democracy, Somaliland contrasts dramatically with Somalia, which perpetually teeters on the brink of state failure”. Others, including Freedom House, agree.

On morality and being well informed, Mr. Okeke-Von Batten who mainly relies on United Somali Alliance and the Somali Embassy in Washington, D.C, and perhaps social media to dredge up negative news about Somaliland, seems to have completely missed the war criminal known as Tuke working with his employer whose atrocities against the people of Somaliland are well documented.

When asked about Mr. Tuke, Mr Okeke-Von Batten stated “My partners and I have never met the noted person. Please report your claim to the proper authorities. You can find the number of the Department of Justice on their website. Nevertheless, thank you for informing me about the noted person. I will make sure (if your claims are proven correct) we do not sign on to represent this individual.”

Despite behaving like an online troll, Mr. Okeke-Von Batten projects an image of a sophisticated man with deep connections on Capitol Hill and in the Whitehouse, but outside of social media, Mr. Okeke-Von Batten is virtually unheard of especially on the Capitol Hill. Several Congressional staffers we asked about Mr. Okeke-Von Batten stated that they have never heard of Mr. Okeke-Von Batten.

On Twitter, Mr. Okeke-Von Batten’s firm is followed by a respectable 40,235 followers, but less than 300 list their location as the greater Washington, D.C region. While this does not include those who may live in the Washington, DC area but do not report this on their Twitter profiles, this relatively small number—along with the small number of retweets Von Batten’s posts generate—suggests that his social media messages have very little reach among U.S. policy influencers and audiences. Despite tagging notable policymakers and news outlets, these tweets do not receive engagement from government officials, Members of Congress, think tank experts, or the media, the firm’s Twitter activity is not acknowledged or responded to by relevant individuals in the Washington, DC stakeholder community among which Mr. Okeke-Von Batten claims to be a prominent member.

On this point, we asked Mr. Okeke-Von Batten “Unlike other lobbying firms which exercise a great deal of discretion on the work they perform on their client’s behalf and charge a lot more than your firm, you frequently boast about blocking bills about Somaliland and being part of getting Ethiopia off AGOA, are you really that influential or simply trying to build a business by trolling Somaliland on Twitter?” and he responded “We are a very small firm and only take cases we believe in. This means we work 24/7 to ensure that our client’s interests are protected and that our clients’ concerns are known to the public. We fight tooth and nail in Congress and the White House to ensure our clients win. That is why they hire us” and ended with a bizarre line that thanked Somalilanders as their attack makes him more popular.

Although some Somalilanders perceive the current President of Somalia, Mr. Hassan Sh. Mohamoud is laissez-faire compared to his predecessor Mr. Farmajo who viewed Somaliland through a hostile lenses that harkens back to the days of Dictator Barre, what is clear is that Somalia Federal Government is staying the course and is prioritizing the diplomatic war of the Republic of Somaliland over pressing matters at home that require its full attention through surrogates in diaspora such as United Somali Alliance and by Mr. Karl-Marx Okeke-Von Batten.

Mr. Hassan Sh Mahamoud has been much more conciliatory at least in tone towards Somaliland, and at some point, while running for President has even apologized to the people of Somaliland for the atrocities committed by the dictatorial regime of Mohamed Said Barre which massacred tens of thousands of civilians and leveled all major cities in present-day Somaliland, a regime that employed war criminals such as Tuke who is currently employed by the Somali Embassy in Washington DC, but in a hypocritical 180 degrees, President Hassan Sh. Mohamoud, speaking to a gathering of Somali diaspora during his visit to the United States, reaffirmed his opposition to an independent Somaliland, essentially committing to the course charted by his predecessor to bring as much diplomatic muscle down on Somaliland.

The Somali government which has consistently ranked as one of poorest and the most corrupt governments in the world may not be getting the intended return on investment in Mr. Okeke-Von Batten’s services as United States policy towards Somaliland is driven by the geostrategic security interest that looks decades into the future, and legislators on Capitol Hill have their research institutions and policy experts augmented by the most accurate information distilled from sophisticated intelligence networks and do not rely on things tweeted at them on social media.

It is important to note that Somalia is reliant entirely on donors which the United States pays the majority share, funds that come from taxpayers and are intended to stabilize a war-torn country, feed a hungry population suffering from the compounding effect of Al-Shabaab and drought so it is worth asking if the source of the funding are coming from donor funds, diaspora such as United Somali Alliance or the People’s Republic of China which sees Somaliland’s bilateral ties as a precursor to what Mr. Okeke-Von Batten was hired to prevent.

Mr. Okeke-Von Batton has accepted his fate and the futility of his effort with his almost incoherent reply to the recent tweet from Senator Risch’s office, in which he showed gratitude to Somaliland for its friendship. He expresses shock and states that the Ranking Member of the Senate Foreign Committee does not speak for the United States and that he and his backers will keep opposing the inevitable with all his might. An amazing display of self-aggrandizement that Mr. Okeke-Von Batten fancies himself more powerful than the Ranking Member of the US Senate Foreign Affairs Committee.

Organized Corruption: Despite Presidential Decree to Re-Nationalize, Motor Vehicle License Plate Remains in Private Hands

Staff

October 20, 2022

On December 18th, 2019, the Office of the President of the Republic of Somaliland issued a directive that rescinded public service contracts previously awarded to private entities with immediate effect and that the government of Somaliland will take control of servicing vehicle ownership documents and plate numbers.

The directive cited the absence of Public and Private Partnership laws and framework as a reason to void these service contracts the government has previously awarded to private businesses and stated that the government is prepared to compensate after a thorough evaluation of initial investment and depreciation.

In addition to the vehicle ownership and motor vehicle plate services, President Bihi has previously re-nationalized the Berbera Oil Terminals, security, and parking services for Egal International in August 2018.

One of the services mentioned directly by the President’s directive was the contract for motor vehicle plates held by Hodan Enterprises which is owned by Mr. Mahamed Ahmed Hassan (Baarjeex) a prominent Somaliland businessman who has held this contract for decades under successive governments.

Company Name	Registered Owner	Tax Identification
Hodan Enterprises	Mahamed Ahmed Hassan (Baarjeex)	100122221

In a direct contradiction to President Bihi’s decree, government records examined by Somaliland Chronicle show that the motor vehicle license plate service contract remains with Hodan Enterprises, which has charged the public more than 2.5 million US dollars for its service since December 2019.

Payments from the Ministry of Finance to Hodan Enterprises for Motor Vehicle Plates

Period	Amount (SL SH.)	Amount (US $ 8500 xch rate)
2022-04	2,471,231,520.00	$290,733.12
2022-08	2,468,388,940.00	$290,398.70
2021-10	2,223,600,000.00	$261,600.00
2020-02	2,000,000,000.00	$235,294.12
2020-07	2,000,000,000.00	$235,294.12
2020-04	1,952,280,000.00	$229,680.00
2021-01	1,930,176,728.00	$227,079.62
2021-05	1,528,353,000.00	$179,806.24
2022-02	1,302,003,026.00	$153,176.83
2020-10	1,015,560,000.00	$119,477.65
2020-12	960,000,000.00	$112,941.18
2021-10	624,668,400.00	$73,490.40
2022-10	584,838,745.74	$68,804.56
2021-07	489,087,000.00	$57,539.65
2021-04	401,823,272.00	$47,273.33
Total	21,952,010,631.74	$2,582,589.49

Ministers of Finance Development Dr. Sa’ad Ali Shire and Transportation and Road Development Mr. Abdirisak Ibrahim Mohamed Farah have confirmed that Hodan Enterprises provides motor vehicle plate services to the government of Somaliland. Minister Shire would only state that the contract remains under review and is in the process of being re-nationalized, while the Minister of Transportation and Road Development said he was unfamiliar with the mechanics of this contract as he just took the helm but is aware of the fact that Hodan Enterprises is still in charge.

According to multiple sources who spoke on strict condition of anonymity, for fear of retaliation, the former Minister of Transportation and Road Development Mr. Abdillahi Abokor Osman, and possibly others, including President Bihi, have taken a stake in Hodan Enterprises to keep the lucrative contract in place. Somaliland Chronicle cannot verify these allegations.

Other government insiders point to lack of parliamentary oversight and accountability of the executive branch as well as Mr. Mohamed Baarjeeh’s prominence as a reason why President Bihi’s decree was not fully implemented.

The President’s directive to re-nationalize motor vehicle-related services and other public infrastructure, such as Berbera Oil Terminal, was lauded as a major step towards combatting rampant corruption in Somaliland’s public institutions where basic services were contracted out to private businesses with minimum oversight. It is unclear if other services that President Bihi re-nationalized in his multiple decrees remain in private hands.

Efforts to reach Mr. Mohamed Baarjeeh, the owner of Hodan Enterprises, the office of the President, and the former Minister of Transportation and Road Development, Mr. Abdillahi Abokor Osman, for comment on this contract were unsuccessful.

Notice: This is an article by Somaliland Chronicle. It is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Under this license, all reprints and non-commercial distribution of this work is permitted.

Questions And Answers with Taiwan’s Minister of Foreign Affairs Mr. Jaushieh Joseph Wu.

Staff

October 18, 2022

Minister Wu took questions from pool of international media reporters in Taipei on October 12th, 2022. The session was moderated by Catherine Y.M Hsu, the Director General of International Information Services, Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

Andrius Balciunas, Lithuanian Public Broadcaster.

So, straight away, I am interested in when Lithuania started to have bilateral ties with Taiwan, the Taiwanese Government has promised several investment funds to Lithuania, but the process as I understand it is not moving or moving very slowly so my question is basically to put it simply, where is the money, when is it going to arrive?

The second part is, Beijing was very angry at the name of the Taiwanese Representative Office in Vilnius, that it has the word Taiwanese, so are they any negotiations about changing the name with Lithuania. Thank you

Minister Wu

Wow! Three big questions, and I will try to answer them one by one. The reason why Taiwan and Lithuania were able to establish this Representative Office relations is because we share the same values of freedom democracy and the protection of human rights, and we also have similar history. Lithuanian got rid of the Russians, and Taiwan got rid of the authoritarian rules or martial law rules and because of that the two countries the two people coming there close to each other very quickly and in the high time of COVID we donated some face masks to Lithuania and last year, Lithuania also donated some vaccines to Taiwan, and you can see that the reaction from the people are very passionate and that is propelling the relations between the two sides to go there quickly and if you go to a store here in Taiwan and try to find an Lithuanian products, very quickly products are going to be taken by the Taiwanese people and therefore you can see the trade relations have been going very well the trade figure went up for like 30% in the last year or so this is very quick development.

And Lithuania also speaks out, Lithuanian government officials also speaks out for freedom and democracy especially for the Taiwanese people there were several accounts already That you were Foreign Minister, Mr. Landsbergis is spoke about freedom loving people should look out for each other or you know, the world should support Taiwan because of the value of freedom and that is very touching to the Taiwanese people. So that is facilitating closer relations between the two sides.

And the second question is about the investment. The investment case is handled by a Capital Group over here [in Taipei] and they are very careful with the evaluation of the target of their investment. And as far as I know, they have identified several of them and they’re reviewing very carefully and should be done fairly soon. The way that we try to be more careful does not mean that it’s not coming, actually it’s coming, and we hope that when it comes there can be some celebration that Taiwanese investment is actually coming to Lithuania.

And your third question was is about the name and we really appreciate it very much that what is saying that the Taiwan ese people should be allowed to call itself the way it wants to call it, and if you look at the international community, Taiwanese people are very often denied our name. for instance, for Taiwan to be able to participate in the Olympics, we need to call ourselves Chinese Taipei, and Chinese Taipei is not or the national title, and to the Taiwanese people if there’s anyone who is willing know call Taiwan Taiwan, or to call the Taiwanese Taiwanese that is highly appreciated. and that is the way the Lithuanian government has been talking about. and there’s no mentioning of discussions or negotiations to rename our Representative Office in Vilnius and because of that that is highly appreciated.

Léo Purguette, La Marseillaise, France.

I have two questions. Concurrently what could be a mutual arrangement for you Is it the status quo? I have noticed that Elon Musk’s proposition is absolutely unacceptable for you.

And the second one, what do you have to say to the CCP delegates who are going to meet soon in Congress? In their Congress or in the Congress, 2020, the party Congress.

Minister Wu

The first is about the peaceful settlement between Taiwan and China, and if you heard what the president said yesterday, I think Taiwan is rather open to discussions or negotiations or contact or communications with the Chinese side, we have been holding several main concepts in having negotiations with China. For example there has to be dialogue rather than in conflict and the dialogue has to be based on the parity that the two sides should be equal to each other, and it should also respect the Taiwanese people and should also follow the principle of democracy, you know, Taiwan is already a democracy any kind of settlement needs to be approved by the people of Taiwan, so all these kinds of fundamental principles universally accepted should also be accepted by China as well, so if the Chinese can laid down their preconditions which is One China I think the cross-strait dialogues can take place in a smooth way, and the Chinese side is not taking that route, the Chinese side has been imposing conditions on Taiwan. They want Taiwan to accept One China principle which means that Taiwan is part of them, and they want Taiwan to adopt One Country, Two System model as a solution to the dispute in between Taiwan and China, but if you look at the case of Hong Kong, One Country Two System model is proved to be bankrupt and the Hong Kong people used to enjoying a high degree of freedom there economy is one of the most open and their media is probably one of the freest in East Asia as well, but after the imposition of the National Security Law a couple of years ago all this is gone, there is no more freedom and the publicly elected officials in Hong Kong as long as they are pro-democracy they are being thrown out of office one after another and Taiwanese people are watching this taking place and therefore the Taiwanese people through public opinion survey have totally rejected the Chinese offer of One Country Two System model and as I said, if there’s going to be any settlement of disputes between Taiwan and China it has to come from diplomatic or peaceful negotiation in order to reach a peaceful solution. And if the Chinese want to have a peaceful solution, they also need to recognize that Taiwan is already an established democracy, and by using force against Taiwan, or trying to intimidate Taiwan by military force, or trying to isolate Taiwan internationally, or trying to impose economic sanctions against Taiwan actually is pushing Taiwan people further and further away.

On the twenties party congress, we noticed that China is about to have its twenties part of congress right now they’re probably entering their preparatory stage already, but this is their internal development their internal manner and for outside world to discuss China ‘s internal matter is probably not appropriate.

Suyeon Kim, Mainichi Newspaper, Japan.

Thank you very much for meeting with us, my name is Suyeon Kim from the Mainichi Newspaper in Japan and, I would like to also ask about the question with regard to CCP congress everywhere so wondering what’s going to what’s going to happen then after the CCP ‘s congress and during the Xi Jinping third term third term, do you expect China will strengthen its military pressure on Taiwan and if so how is the Taiwan planning to address these problems? Thank you.

Minister Wu

Indeed, President Xi Jinping is coming to assume his third term after the 20th Party Congress. There’s a lot of discussions with the Chinese going to be even tougher on Taiwan afterward, or China is going to be more accommodating because he does not have to face the reelection anymore. So the kinds of discussion is up to what the Chinese people want to adopt, but the way we look at China ‘s political development is that it has a lot of domestic issues to handle. If you look at the recent COVID lockdown in China is causing tremendous economic problems in China and it is also causing domestic discontent and other than COVID lockdown it also has Severe financial problems, some of the local banks are actually having real difficulties, and the Chinese real estate industry, it’s also facing very serious problems these days.

And I think for a genuine leader of the Chinese people, he needs to try and solve the problems China is facing or at least he needs to try to resolve some of the difficulties the Chinese people are facing.

And for the Chinese Government to look outward and try to pick on a small guy like Taiwan and to create crisis to divert domestic attention is probably not the best way for the Chinese people and in that sense I will continue to call out the Chinese leaders to think about the peaceful way to resolve the differences in between the two sides.

Suyeon Kim, Mainichi Newspaper, Japan.

So are you the optimistic about future threats?

Minister Wu

it’s going to be hard to anticipate what will happen across the Taiwan Strait, whether it’s going to be more peaceful or China is going to be more intimidating it’s totally up to China and so far we are still watching very carefully and I probably need to address a little bit about the way we look at the cross-strait crisis that we experience in august in early august the kinds of threat against Taiwan including missile tests very close to Taiwan ‘s waters and some of them are actually landed in Japanese claimed EEZ and also a large number of aircrafts and ships conducting air and sea exercises and also cyber-attacks and disinformation campaign and economic coercion and putting all this together, I think it’s Chinese playbook of the future invasion of Taiwan, and that is something that we can do without.

A peaceful and stable cross-strait relations essentially serves the best interest of all parties concerned, and the Chinese way of trying to alter the status quo by force is the most unfortunate thing that can happen to the Taiwan strait and it’s not just the Taiwanese people saying that you know we need peace and stability across the cross-strait, the Japanese government has also been speaking in numerous occasions that the cross-strait peace and stability is very important matter and it’s not only Japan if you look at G7 or EU or other forms of multilateral statements, they come out and say that the peace and stability over the Taiwan strait is very important, and I certainly hope that the Chinese leaders or Chinese decision makers will listen to all these opinions coming out of international organizations or international multilateral forums or coming from international leaders like the Japan and to act accordingly to try and keep the cross-strait situation in a peaceful and stable way.

Ms. Kaye Albyt, Radio New Zealand.

Hello, I am just asking a question on behalf of my colleagues at work who work in the Pacific region, they would like to know whether Taiwan is providing any support to the Malaita province in Solomon Islands which has resisted the switch to China? And question two: Would Taiwan be open to a switch back in domestic ties for its former pacific allies noting that some places like Kiribati have been around the block a couple of times so I think they’re asking their whether Taiwan would be open to any countries changing alliances back to Taiwan.

Minister Wu

Thank you thank you very much for these two questions the issue of Malaika problems we do have some friends over there and they ask for some small assistance you know for example during the height of COVID they asked for some material and we did try to support them with COVID materials or COVID prevention materials and the leader of Malaita province was Suidani for a period of time and he wanted to come to Taiwan for treatment and we therefore accepted him for treatment here in Taiwan , so we just come out of this humanitarian perspective in trying to provide support to Malaita and other than humanitarian assistance, there’s no other type of contest.

And for the future of Solomon Islands, I think it’s up to the Solomon people to decide and on the question of whether we are trying to you know actively solicit the switch of diplomatic ties from our former diplomatically like Carabas we are not doing it, but i think our posture is open if the Carabas people feel that China after all these big promises are not coming to provide any assistance to Carabas and they feel that they want to come back to Taiwan to submit diplomatic ties we are open to that but we are not actively seeking the switch of diplomatic relations and I think it’s up to the Carabas people again. Thank you.

Let me say a few more words about the larger picture other than just two specific things if you look at China ‘s authoritarian expansion in the pacific It is very worrisome. If you look at the Chinese military exercises during this period, even though the general international audience is focused on the Taiwan strait, but very often, the Chinese air or sea exercises were carried out east of the first island chain, and sometimes they go very deep into the pacific close to Guam or even further than Guam, and in June this year they sign a security agreement with the Solomon Islands. And if you look at the position of Solomon Islands, it’s so far away from China, but right at the doorstep of Australia, and you can see the ambition of the authoritarianism in China. And when they expand their authoritarian order, it’s altering the rules-based international order. And for democracies, these kinds of action or this kind of expansionism is probably not so welcomed and under these kinds of circumstances democracies New Zealand, Australia and Japan and Taiwan and the United States who care about the free and open Indo-Pacific need to work further with each other to make sure that we can prevent authoritarianism from further expansion

Saeed S Ibrahim, Somaliland Chronicle. Somaliland.

Thank you very much Minister Wu for your valuable time. My question is, Taiwan and Somaliland have recently established bilateral ties, and as you know Somaliland is situated strategically in a place that almost can become a beachhead for Taiwan to actually get more diplomatic ties with other African countries and as a model or an alternative to the Chinese debt trap as people call, and although Taiwan is about to start oil exploration as its first large scale direct foreign investment in Somaliland, is it part of your government’s policy to seek diplomatic ties by using direct foreign investment in Somaliland as a model to potentially attract more relationships from other countries that are trying to get from under the Chinese debt trap? Thank you.

Minister Wu

Well, thank you very much for this Somaliland specific question. Somaliland and Taiwan stablished the Representative Office relations and for year three years ago and we were very happy with the way the two countries are respecting each other and working together and with each other. We already send our technical team to Somaliland, we are thinking about how to provide with more medical support, providing Somaliland with agricultural production, and whenever there’s a drought or natural disaster or manmade disaster Taiwan is always there to provide support to Somaliland, and if you compare the way the Taiwanese people or Taiwanese government is supporting Somaliland to the Chinese way of providing support to other African countries, it’s a very clear contrast.

We try to establish the Taiwanese model, the Taiwanese model is to go through our technical missions and go through our medical institutions here in Taiwan to provide medical assistance, and we also go through our technical mission to improve your agricultural production and we try to invite Somaliland students to Taiwan for job training, for education things like that, and I think this is going quite well except that we are experiencing COVID in the last few years and therefore the exchanges have been slowing down, but otherwise we would like to establish a Taiwan model of development in Somaliland so that the people in Africa can see what the difference in is in between the Taiwanese model and the Chinese model and a lot of People have been critical of the Chinese model. It starts from the Indian Ocean to Africa. China is trying to push for its Belt and Road initiative go all the way in Indian Ocean to Africa and even to Eastern part of Europe, but they are interested more in the securing ports for their future naval expansion. Look at Cambodia, Myanmar, Bangladesh, and then Sri Lanka, Pakistan all the way to Djibouti. They don’t care whether the government over there can afford the huge loans they got from China but the Chinese if you look at the example of Sri Lanka and China is so happy that it can have a ninety nine year operation for the Hambantota port and at the same time Sri Lanka has already declared bankruptcy but the Chinese government is not providing any assistance to the Sri Lankan government so this is the Chinese mode of expansion, and the Chinese way of helping other countries with debt-trap diplomacy or their assistance leading to corruption and I’m sure that is something that the people in those countries that will come to China’s build world initiative can do without.

So with Somaliland, we want to show to the international community that there’s something different that Taiwan can do to help the people directly, and this is what we are trying to do and I agree with you that Somaliland is strategically located but other than the fact that Somaliland especially port of Berbera is strategically located, Somaliland is also a democracy, a shine model of democracy in the continent of Africa and that is something that Taiwan or other fellow democracies to work closely with.

I was about to visit Somaliland last year, if not for the sudden spike of COVID in Taiwan, I would have made the first trip to Somaliland to discuss with the Somaliland leaders how we can further consolidate Somaliland’s democracy or to discuss ways for Somaliland to further economically to further the economic cooperation for your economic development, but I will continue to look for a time to visit your country. Thank you

Thierry Jacolet, La Liberté, Geneva

Mr. Wu, I have two questions Taiwan ‘s taking a paying a great deal of attention about what is happening in Ukraine, regarding the few countries that recognize Taiwan, and they are especially islands and the strategic ambiguity of two of your allies, USA and Japan, what can you expect from the foreign countries for the support in case of Chinese aggression or to calm down China?

And my second question is, as you seem to be the master of the soft power in Taiwan, I would like to know how this soft power can help you to find a great support from foreign countries?

Minister Wu

The international pressure on Taiwan is a very serious, but if you look at the UN, ICAO and WHO etc. Taiwan is not a member. Taiwan cannot even become an observer. So, the kind of pressure on Taiwan is tremendous And the Ministry of Foreign Affairs here in Taiwan has the responsibility of expanding Taiwan’s room for international participation, and therefore we try to find all kinds of ways to explain Taiwan’s international space and we’ve been working with diplomatic allies and at the same time work with like-minded partners to explain Taiwanese international participation. Our diplomatic allies are being very forthcoming in supporting Taiwan’s international participation for example, and participating in UN or ICAO or WHO etc. They are the ones who are able to speak directly in the assembly to call for Taiwan ‘s participation and that is highly appreciated but at the same time we are also trying to make new friends partner democracies to speak up for Taiwan or to join demarche against the secretariat of the international organizations or for the parliamentarians of the federal democracies to write letters to write petitions to come up with resolutions and etc and so far we have been quite successful in soliciting in international support we have more and more countries especially coming from the government side willing to speak up for Taiwan or to petition the secretariat of various international organizations for Taiwan’s meaningful participation and there are more and more parliamentarians for these may you know drive for the WHO.

The more than 3000 parliamentarians in Europe, in the Latin America or even in Asia, they sign petition to support our participation in the WHO, so there’s a growing awareness, especially after COVID, that Taiwan ‘s participation in international organizations or participating in various international activities should be supported and we appreciate the international support for Taiwan was role in international participation and I think the question is rather simple you know Taiwan has twenty three point five million people and it’s not a small number it’s certainly bigger than the Switzerland but Taiwan has been excluded from the WHO from the UN and et cetera and therefore it’s not fair to the Taiwanese people And whenever there is a need for Taiwan to ask for support or ask for assistance, the international organizations may not be providing the support.

Still, remember back in 1996 when Taiwan went through terrible internal virus, we asked for The WHO to send assistance to Taiwan and it was not coming, was not coming at all. And we saw very young children suffered from internal virus and in 2003 we experienced SARS and at that time we asked for the WHO to send experts to Taiwan to help us deal with the SARS but the WHO did not send expert to Taiwan until there was a major hospital outbreak, and by the time those specialists came to Taiwan, they are prohibited by the WHO to speak with our health officials. So, that is the tough situation we are facing and if you look at the charter of the WHO all people around the world are entitled to the highest standard of health provided by the WHO, but that is not true to the Taiwanese people, and it’s not fair to us, and if you speak to the average Taiwanese person to be excluded from the international organization such as the WHO, is not a good feeling.

And at the same time we also think that Taiwan might be able to provide support at the beginning of the covid provided PPEs and face masks to various countries and that shows that Taiwan is able to support and if we are able to provide support through the WHO, that kind of support can be more effective and this is the simple fact that if Taiwan is not able to provide support through WHO It’s not fair to the rest of the world.

Because of the experience in 2003, the SARS experience in 2003 where we were very alert of what’s going on in China, whether there’s any transmittable diseases that can come to Taiwan. So at the end of 2019, we noticed some signs of that transmittable disease, SARS like diseases, and the patients were treated in isolation and that early alerted us, so we sent a notice to WHO, and then we started screening the people coming from Wuhan area, so we started a rather quickly and Taiwan was very successful in containing the spread of virus here in Taiwan, and this is how we dealt with it, and we think that that kind of experience is also very valuable, and we hope we can share that kind of experience with more people or more countries throughout the world, and indeed we were sharing that experience bilaterally with any country that wants to you know engage Taiwan or exchange with Taiwan. We went through video conferences, our health officials at that time in 2020, it was very busy not only dealing with the pandemic situation here in Taiwan, but we also tried to provide support to other countries through these kinds of mechanism.

And on the second question of soft power, I don’t know whether to describe this as soft power or to allow Taiwan’s story to be heard internationally. We always welcome international visitors to come to Taiwan, and we love friends, and I think you can understand why Taiwan loves friends. We have been pressured by China, and the more friends we have, the better it is for us.

So the best way to make friends is to with each other to be transparent with each other to invite friends to come and visit Taiwan like the way we invite you to visit Taiwan, or to allow Taiwanese people performing groups or artists or whatever to have more opportunities to participate in international activities. Through these kinds of activities Taiwan is going to be noticed more noticed by the international community, and I am very glad to tell you that Taiwan has been described as a force for good in the world in the last few years.

We tried to provide support to the international community, and we join some of the international drives for some good causes. For example Taiwan does not have the problem of terrorism, but we joined the anti-ISIS coalition anyway, we provided support to these organizations hoping that these organization will stop international terrorism, and we also provide support to international religious freedom movement because we think it is very important to promote religious freedom and we are generous in doing that, and because of all these generous contributions or participating in the international activities by making contributions, Taiwan is gradually being caused by being called a force for good in the world and many countries in the world called Taiwan a reliable partner and we are very happy with that and that also adds more responsibility type one that we need to do more good things.

Ms. Mirta Estela Ruiz Diaz, Ultima Horta, Paraguay.

Paraguay is currently Taiwan’s only ally in South America and I would like to ask if there are plans to increase Taiwan’s investment in Paraguay and are there plans expand markets for Paraguayan products in Taiwan’s markets?

Minister Wu

Those are two very good questions, we have been organizing trade and investment delegations to Paraguay as we speak right now, there’s a group of businessmen in Paraguay right now they are speaking with Paraguay industries for expansion of cooperation, and we will continue to do that. I was in Paraguay in 2019 I also led a business delegation together with me and the kinds of discussions we were quite successful but then COVID seemed to have affected a lot of things going on, but we will continue to encourage our businessmen to think about the investment cases in Paraguay.

I think Paraguay has a very good geographical location, and that is being recognized by the Taiwanese people, and I think right now is to encourage more Taiwanese businessmen to look at Paraguay. And after all, Paraguay is such an important friend of ours for so long and there is a natural affinity between the high-level official in Paraguay and Taiwan, so we have full intention to work together with the Paraguay government to enhance the bilateral investment relations.

And the second question is the opening up of Taiwanese market or further opening of Taiwan’s market for the Paraguayan product if you look at Paraguay’s products there are two main items one is beef and another one is pork, when i was in Paraguay in 2019, I brought together with me a very good news to expand the quota of or to lift the quota limitation on the Paraguay beef and I think because of that effort the Paraguay export of beef to Taiwan has increased so tremendously that Taiwan has become the most important export market for the Paraguay’s beef.

And we have also been discussing with the Paraguayan Government on opening up towards pork market for the pork products from Paraguay and the announcement is about to be made, and we are ready to welcome the pork products coming from Paraguay. So, trust us the faith is there, and we are very sincere in working together with the Paraguay Government to make sure that the trade and investment relations between our two countries say very healthy.

Mr. José Angel Santamaria Salaza, El Universal, Mexico

Good afternoon Mr. Wu, two questions: How is Taiwan’s diplomatic relationship with Mexico? And how do you hope to strengthen diplomatic relations with Mexico? And another question that is more general, what is Taiwan ‘s greatest achievement?

Minister Wu

We have very good trade and economic relations with Mexico, the trade volume or Taiwanese investment going into Mexico is tremendous by taking the strategic location of Mexico that is very close to the united states, so the economic side the relations are very strong, and the economic officials between the two size have engagement with each other every once in a while especially the senior level trade officials, so we will continue to do that but politically we don’t go very far I think the Mexican officials think that its relations with China is very important and that concerned about offending China by reaching out to Taiwan for some official contact, actually that leads to a common question that we face these days in some countries do think that their relations with China are very important, some of the countries in Taiwan’s vicinity do think that way but I think we can also look at the leverage China is concerned that there are more countries that will come to Taiwan citizens or to have official contact with Taiwan and if you do have an official contacts with Taiwan I think that is going to increase your leverage. Lithuania happens to be a case that we can think about the reason why the Chinese Government is targeting Lithuania and come down with the heavy hand, because they think that local area is small and it’s weak and they can punish Lithuania. But if more and more countries think that it’s the right thing to get in touch with someone to negotiate with Taiwan, to enhance ties with Taiwan, I just don’t think that China is able to retaliate against that many countries all together, so this is a very simple calculation and especially Mexico which right next to the United States if there’s anything that you would need the US support in dealing with an authoritarian China I am sure the united states will be more than happy to support you.

And the second question is about Taiwan, such achievement I would like to say a political side and economic side, if you look at the political side, Taiwan was an authoritarian country before, in 1996. We are gradually evolving from an authoritarian country beginning from 1986, 1987 to 1996, before 1987 Taiwan was run by martial law, and it was a highly authoritarian country and we did not have freedom we did not have human rights we were not able to elect our public officials at all, but beginning from 1987 we pushed the martial law of the edge and Taiwan was he involved in a series of political development, democratic development and in the year 1996 we were able to elect our president for the first time democratically and popularly, and by that time Taiwan was recognized internationally as the first democracy in this part of the world and as we run for presidential election and parliamentary elections over time Taiwan has consolidated its democracy and this is something that is being recognized internationally if you look at the indexes coming out of major international organizations doing the survey on freedom and democracy Taiwan is probably the most democratic countries in the Asia pacific and in terms of freedom Taiwan is the freest society in east Asia, and if you look at equality, gender equality included, Taiwan is probably the highest in this area as well so we are very proud of this achievement and we are very proud that the major rating international organizations rated Taiwan as a full-fledged democracy and red Taiwan as a fully democratic or fully free society, so that is a very important for us and another achievement is economic achievement in the fifties and sixties, Taiwan was very poor and we relied on international assistance especially assistance coming from the united states but gradually we were able to build up our economy.

We were able to build up our industries and beginning from 1970s and 80s, we were able to start the development of Taiwan semiconductor industry and also Taiwan ‘s ICT sector and by this point, you can probably tell that Taiwan is a powerhouse of the IC products in the world. If you look at all the end products of computer chips, Taiwan has about 65% percent in the world production, and if you look at the highest end of the assembly the conductor computer chips Taiwan has more than ninety percent, so this is a high concentration of computer chips here in Taiwan and this is coming through a lot of effort, not only by the government but also by the industries and also by the international community, you know, gradually we’ve probably a very solid ecosystem here in Taiwan, the material suppliers, the producers and the application industries are here in Taiwan, they all reside in Taiwan.

I don’t know whether you had a chance to visit the Shinju Science Park or Taichung Science Park or Tainan Science Park. These are huge in science parks and these kinds of ecosystem is not found anywhere else and we are very proud of Taiwan can be a powerhouse of the computer or ICT products.

Jimmy Sengenberger, Denver Gazette, Denver Colorado.

Thank you so much Foreign Minister, I really appreciate this opportunity and you have many friends in Colorado, in the United States and of course recently our president has essentially really affirmed the commitment to Taiwan’s security in the event of say an invasion and of course we had speaker of the house Nancy Pelosi Just recently visiting Taiwan despite Chinas pushback.

I’m curious two part question #1. How would you assess the current state of any formal or informal security agreements between the US and Taiwan, vis a vis Taiwan and the PRC?

And then can you talk broadly about the importance of American – Taiwanese relations because certainly there’s a unique role that the United States has to play on the world and can play in regard to Taiwan. Thank you so much.

Minister Wu

Thank you very much for the questions. I’ve been to Colorado several times and I really enjoyed it. There was a time I was in Colorado, invited Colorado Springs and Congressman Lamborn, he was newly elected, and I was serving as Taiwan’s Ambassador to Washington DC at the time and he invited me for breakfast in Colorado Springs, and they explained to me that the Colorado people have beef steak for breakfast, and that was very amazing to me. But I like the landscape, I like the people over there. They’re passionate. They’re nice people.

And other than, you know, seeing the very nice people over there, yeah, I also spoke with lots of media in Colorado in my visits to your state.

So, I would say that the, the State of Colorado is a great friend of Taiwan. In fact the United States is a great friend of Taiwan and we enjoy support coming from the United States is not just the administration it’s also the successive administrations either the Republican administration or the Democratic administration they may provide support to Taiwan in various forms or various ways, but there is support to Taiwan is unequivocal, and we also enjoy bipartisan support from the Capital Hill know congressman from the United States continued to tell us that they are divided on all kinds of issues but this one issue that can unite them that is the Taiwan issue, and we are very happy that the congressional leaders in the united states continue to propose resolutions bills and etcetera to come to Taiwan support and in the Washington’s policy community used to be divided in between the blue camps and the red camps but right now there is only Taiwan team or Taiwan camp in the policy circle in Washington DC, and we are very happy to enjoy the kind of support that United States has been providing to Taiwan. And based on that I would like to say the security ties in between Taiwan and the United States has been very strong, very solid.

We continue to buy arms from the United States for our self-defense and the United States is the probably the only country in the world that will be willing to sell defensive articles to Taiwan and that is really appreciated and together with the answer of course there will be training there will be maintenance there will be other type of for cooperation that comes with arms sales, and all these have been going on and therefore you can see the security relations between Taiwan and the United States have been going very well, and especially after the war in Ukraine I think the international community, the decision makers in the United States or the Taiwanese people and the Taiwanese government understand that the war may not be that far, and if there’s going to be a war between Taiwan and China, we all want the Taiwanese people to be able to defend ourselves, so we expedited the process of security discussions with each other trying to discuss what kind of defense policies is the best for Taiwan, and we’ve been following through with the recommendations of the united states and we hope that the United States will continue to provide support to Taiwan so that Taiwan is able to defend itself.

A lot of people are talking about the United States intervening in Taiwan’s contingency, and president Biden was talking about the American men and women to come to Taiwan ‘s defense but we look at The dependency issue this way: Defending Taiwan is our own responsibility. And if we are not willing to defend ourselves or we are not determined to defend ourselves, we don’t have the right to ask for any support at all. And I can tell you that Taiwanese people are more determined than ever to defend ourselves after all this is our democracy, this is our people this is our democratic way of life, and this is our sovereignty, and we will definitely defend it. Some people are saying that Taiwan is small, and China is so big and powerful, but we have faith in ourselves, and we have faith in democracy as well.

If you look at the case of Ukraine, a lot of people at the beginning of the war in February are saying that the Ukraine is going to fall prey to Russia in a matter of days. But look at the Ukrainian people. They are determined to defend themselves, and they show their determination and their bravery to the international community. And that attracts a lot of support coming from around the world, including from Taiwan. And we show support because the Ukrainians are determined to defend themselves. And we want to show to the international community that we are willing to defend ourselves, and we are absolutely determined to defend ourselves too. And we have faith, and in the end, we believe that democracy is going to prevail in Taiwan will also prevail.

Lesroy Williams, Director General @ St Kitts and Nevis Information Service

Thank you, Minister Wu. My question is a very simple one. The rest of the world has condemned the Russia invasion of Ukraine. China ‘s Has remained silent and he has not publicly condemned Russia for this invasion. What is Taiwan’s interpretation of this?

Minister Wu

Hi and thank you very much for that question. When Russia launched its attack against Ukraine on February 24^th, Taiwan joined the fellow democracies in condemning Russia, and we also joined the international community in the sanctions against Russia.

We want to make sure that none of Taiwan’s products will be used by Russia as part of its weapons to attack the innocent Ukrainians, and we also provided lots of support to the Ukrainian people especially to the displaced Ukrainians living in Poland and Slovakia in the Czech Republic etc, and the people here in Taiwan also reacted in a very strong way they want to make donations they urged the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to open up an account to accept their donation And they also donated materials, 562 tons altogether, and we sent the materials to Poland and to Slovakia to go inside Ukraine to support the Ukrainian people. We did this not because Taiwan and Ukraine had good political relations before, or we are asking anything in return. That is only because we think it is the right thing to do.

We want to do the right thing by standing together with peace loving democracies around the world to go against an invader an uninvited invader that attacked a fellow democracy of ours so that is why we did that. But if you listen to the joint statement from Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping at the beginning of February when the Putin participated in the Winter Olympics those kinds of languages were very alarming, and throughout the war until this day, China never said anything against Russia, and I think you can see the mentality of the Chinese government, they are on the one hand we want to continue to support Russia in a very quiet way for example increasing trade buy more oil so that Russia can stay alive economically and they also want to go through the international organizations to have serious actions against Russia the very recent example of the annexation of those four provinces the United Nations wanted to have a vote on that but China and Russia just beat to it you can see that those two guys are working with each other in a very quiet way and i think it’s gradually leading to the Ukrainian people started viewing the kinds of relationship they are having with China some of the Ukrainian political leaders like there their Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee in the Rada, they’re describing Taiwan ese people are their friends providing a genuine support but at the same time China is their enemy’s friend so that’s probably some of the kinds of relations between China and Russia thank you minister one more question oh one more poster from Bulgaria republic of Bulgaria what is the consistent message that you would like the rest of the world to hear from Taiwan That’s a big question.

easy and very hard question but thank you very much for asking that question the message can be very simple and can also be very complicated Taiwan is a democracy we are very proud of that and because we are a democracy we share the same values of freedom and the protection of human rights and rule of law with fellow democracies and based on this we hope we can make more friends with fellow democracies but because of the neighbor we have a joint neighbor very powerful politically or economically that has made it very difficult for us to reach out to the broad international community and make friends for instance we don’t have an office in Bulgaria we hope we can have an office in Bulgaria soon but it looks very difficult but what we would like to let the international community understand is that Taiwan is a very open society is a democracy and economically it is also a powerhouse of the modern technological products and we would like to work together with the rest of the world to advance the fortune of the mankind and we would like to work with fellow democracies to advance the shared values so that they are more people can enjoy freedom and democracy and the protection of human rights thank you very much mike this chair and thank you everyone and all of you are very tight schedule especially during the national day celebration week so and also to our media friends i’m sure this definitely another.

Mr. Radoslav Smilkov, Fakti, Bulgaria

What is the consistent message you would like the rest of the world to hear from Taiwan.

Minister Wu

That is a very big question but thank you very much for that question, the message can be very simple and very complicated. Taiwan is a democracy, and we are very proud of that, and because we are a democracy, we share the same values of freedom and the protection of human rights rule of law with fellow democracies, based on this, we hope we can make more friends with fellow democracies. But because of the neighbor we have, a giant neighbor that is very powerful, politically and economically that has made it very difficult for us to reach out to the broad international community and make friends. For instance, we don’t have an office in Bulgaria, we hope we can office in Bulgaria but it looks very difficult but we would like to let the international community understand that Taiwan is a very open society, it is a democracy and economically it is a powerhouse of modern technological products and we would like to work with the rest of the world to advance the fortune of mankind, and we would like to work with fellow democracies to advance the shared values, so that more can people can enjoy freedom, democracy and human rights.

1...232425...90 Page 24 of 90

Investigative Reports

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

About the Author

Payments from the Ministry of Finance to Hodan Enterprises for Motor Vehicle Plates

Andrius Balciunas, Lithuanian Public Broadcaster.

Minister Wu

Léo Purguette, La Marseillaise, France.

Minister Wu

Suyeon Kim, Mainichi Newspaper, Japan.

Minister Wu

Suyeon Kim, Mainichi Newspaper, Japan.

Minister Wu

Ms. Kaye Albyt, Radio New Zealand.

Minister Wu

Saeed S Ibrahim, Somaliland Chronicle. Somaliland.

Minister Wu

Thierry Jacolet, La Liberté, Geneva

Minister Wu

Ms. Mirta Estela Ruiz Diaz, Ultima Horta, Paraguay.

Minister Wu

Mr. José Angel Santamaria Salaza, El Universal, Mexico

Minister Wu

Jimmy Sengenberger, Denver Gazette, Denver Colorado.

Minister Wu

Lesroy Williams, Director General @ St Kitts and Nevis Information Service

Minister Wu

Mr. Radoslav Smilkov, Fakti, Bulgaria

Minister Wu

About us

Most recent

Most popular

Subscribe